Newsletter/October2009: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia UK
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(press coverage)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
| s5_title = Press Coverage
| s5_title = Press Coverage
| s5_content =  
| s5_content =  
; Editor numbers
The big story in the last 2 months has been the research by Felipe Ortega showing a decrease in wikipedia editors of over 49,000, where a wikipedia editor is defined as anyone that has made an edit to Wikipedia. For more information on the numbers, see [http://libresoft.es/Members/jfelipe/thesis-wkp-quantanalysis Dr Ortega's doctoral thesis] and [http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/26/wikipedias-volunteer-story/ the Wikimedia Foundation's blog post].
The story was started by the [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125893981183759969.html Wall Street Journal], and it was covered by a range of British newspapers in late November. These included
* Guardian [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/nov/24/breakfast-briefing-wikipedia-editors-loss Techology blog], [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/nov/25/wikipedia-editors-decline "Have you stopped editing Wikipedia? And if so, is it doomed?"], [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/26/wikipedia-losing-disgruntled-editors "Wikipedia falling victim to a war of words"], [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/nov/27/smartbooks-wikipedia-editors-smartphone-prices "Breakfast Briefing: German company claims Smartbook name, Wikipedia responds, and mysterious pricing"]
* The Times: [http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article6930546.ece "Wikipedia shows signs of stalling as number of volunteers falls sharply"], [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article6930419.ece Comment: "Who Knows Best?"], [http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6930560.ece Commentary: "Wikipedia: an anti-intellectual venture to its core"], [http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6930656.ece "Shifting sands offer poor foundation for a dependable truth"], [http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article6930641.ece "Five right, five wrong and five just plain weird"], [http://timesonline.typepad.com/technology/2009/11/wikipedias-influence-grows-but-the-project-is-still-in-trouble.html "Wikipedia's influence grows. But the project is still in trouble."]
* Telegraph: [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6650077/Wikipedia-project-losing-contributors-in-record-numbers.html "Wikipedia project 'losing contributors in record numbers'"], [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6652854/Wikipedia-is-becoming-more-like-a-normal-encyclopaedia.html "Wikipedia is becoming more like a normal encyclopaedia"], [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6660646/Wikipedias-Jimmy-Wales-denies-site-is-losing-thousands-of-volunteer-editors.html "Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales denies site is 'losing' thousands of volunteer editors"]
* This Is London: [http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23774713-wikipedia-could-vanish-as-tighter-rules-prompt-50000-volunteers-to-quit-site.do "Tighter rules prompt 49,000 volunteers to quit Wikipedia"]
* Irish Independent: [http://www.independent.ie/business/technology/wikipedia-project-losing-contributors-in-record-numbers-1953185.html "Wikipedia project 'losing contributors in record numbers'"]
* Daily Mail: [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1230790/Fears-future-Wikipedia-49-000-volunteers-leave-site.html "Fears over future of Wikipedia as 49,000 volunteers leave site"]
* BBC: [http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/11/wikipedia_on_the_wane.html Tech blog: "Wikipedia on the wane?"], [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8379566.stm "Wikipedia 'loses' 49,000 editors"], http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8382477.stm "Wikipedia denies mass exodus of editors"]
* Press Association: [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hOPGxuYbADpVcf_j_YveKyuzHm1A "Wikipedia UK 'definitely not dying'"]
* ITProPortal: [http://www.itproportal.com/portal/news/article/2009/11/25/wikipedia-loses-tens-thousands-editors/ "Wikipedia Lost Tens Of Thousands Of Editors"]
* PC Pro: [http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/broadband/353596/wikipedia-loses-49-000-contributors "Wikipedia loses 49,000 contributors"]
* IT Pro: [http://www.itpro.co.uk/618211/wikipedia-says-editor-numbers-are-stable "Wikipedia has lost editors, but the numbers aren't as dramatic as one report has made them seem."]
* PC World: [http://www.pcworld.com/article/183322/struggling_wikipedia_sheds_thousands_of_editors.html "Struggling Wikipedia Sheds Thousands of Editors"]
* V3.co.uk: [http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2254116/wikipedia-argues-participation "Wikipedia denies contributor exodus"]
;Other coverage has included:
* AP, 25 November: [http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hY-2j32lnkHC3_Pg0JRnuSbGJ1awD9C6LSV80 "2 Beefeaters fired for bullying female colleague"] - "Tower spokeswoman Ruth Howlett says Cameron's entry in the online encyclopedia known as Wikipedia had been defaced as part of the campaign against her." Also covered by the [http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/25/tower-london-yeomen-sacked Guardian] and [http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/11/26/bully-claim-beefeaters-given-chop-115875-21850894/ Mirror].
* Mirror, 22 November: [http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/11/22/bbc-newsgirl-victim-of-internet-hate-campaign-and-number-one-suspect-is-colleague-115875-21840294/ "BBC newsgirl victim of internet hate campaign and number one suspect is colleague"] - "Presenter Tasmin Lucia Khan's entry on online encyclopaedia Wikipedia was hacked into eight times"
* Mirror, 22 November: [http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/11/22/bbc-newsgirl-victim-of-internet-hate-campaign-and-number-one-suspect-is-colleague-115875-21840294/ "BBC newsgirl victim of internet hate campaign and number one suspect is colleague"] - "Presenter Tasmin Lucia Khan's entry on online encyclopaedia Wikipedia was hacked into eight times"
* Guardian, 19 November: [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/nov/19/theirry-henry-fifa-twitter "Thierry Henry and the net: Fifa report whitewash and anger on Twitter"] - "A Wikipedia edit war has also started, with disgruntled fans repeatedly trying to edit Henry's page to include references to cheating. In fact, several pages at Wikipedia have been feeling the "Henry effect" - with a battle raging over the definition of cheating in sport." - also covered by the [http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/internationals/what-if-henry-had-done-the-decent-thing-1824116.html Independent]
* Guardian, 19 November: [http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/pda/2009/nov/19/theirry-henry-fifa-twitter "Thierry Henry and the net: Fifa report whitewash and anger on Twitter"] - "A Wikipedia edit war has also started, with disgruntled fans repeatedly trying to edit Henry's page to include references to cheating. In fact, several pages at Wikipedia have been feeling the "Henry effect" - with a battle raging over the definition of cheating in sport." - also covered by the [http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/internationals/what-if-henry-had-done-the-decent-thing-1824116.html Independent]
Line 35: Line 55:
* The Scotsman, 24 September: [http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Young-people-need-to-be.5674598.jp "Young people need to be encouraged to use Holyrood's petitions process, MSPs told"] — "Mr Crawford welcomed recommendations in a report published by Holyrood's public petitions committee in June. The report said blogs, Wikipedia and YouTube could make parliament more accessible to the public."
* The Scotsman, 24 September: [http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Young-people-need-to-be.5674598.jp "Young people need to be encouraged to use Holyrood's petitions process, MSPs told"] — "Mr Crawford welcomed recommendations in a report published by Holyrood's public petitions committee in June. The report said blogs, Wikipedia and YouTube could make parliament more accessible to the public."
}}
}}
[[Category:Published Reports]]

Latest revision as of 01:39, 23 August 2011

Wikimedia UK Newsletter
October 2009 Issue
<< Previous issue
Next issue >>


Summary: (to be written)

In this month's newsletter:

  1. Fundraising Drive
  2. Museum discussions
  3. Wiki Wednesdays
  4. New meeting style
  5. Press Coverage

Fundraising Drive

On 29th October the Board of Trustees appointed Thomas Dalton (aka Tango) as Head of Fundraising. His role will be to coordinate Wikimedia UK's part in the big Wikimedia fundraising drive starting at the beginning of November. We will be working with the Wikimedia Foundation and expect to raise at least £10,000 and hope to raise far more. We are still looking for volunteers to help write the text for our fundraising website, write press releases, talk to the press and many other things. If you would like to help, please e-mail Tango.

Museum discussions

[MP/JS to complete]

Wiki Wednesdays

[MP? to complete]

New meeting style

With almost a complete turnout of the Board at the recent London Wikimedia Meet-up at Penderell's Oak in Holborn in early October, one conclusion was that the Board should try to use its time in Board meetings even more productively than it does at present. One suggestion that was agreed was that the Board should experiment on holding the first hour of the Board meetings on Skype, thereby, allowing business to flow faster and for more to be achieved at each meeting. The second hour of each Board meeting was to be an IRC meeting, as always, but this time it would work in a more flexible way, with Board decisions and explanation being listed and detailed with 'side-chat rooms' being open for members to ask additional questions and volunteer additional information that the Board may need. This new 'experimental' format is now running and will be reviewed by the Board in due course.

Press Coverage

Editor numbers

The big story in the last 2 months has been the research by Felipe Ortega showing a decrease in wikipedia editors of over 49,000, where a wikipedia editor is defined as anyone that has made an edit to Wikipedia. For more information on the numbers, see Dr Ortega's doctoral thesis and the Wikimedia Foundation's blog post.

The story was started by the Wall Street Journal, and it was covered by a range of British newspapers in late November. These included

Other coverage has included