Talk:2011 Budget/Controls: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (fmt) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. The Board of Trustees will write and publish a budget outlining expected income and expenditure during the financial year. | 1. The Board of Trustees will write and publish a budget outlining expected income and expenditure during the financial year. | ||
: Suggest 'previous financial year'. We should allow for non-Board member participation writing the budget; technically, we should only require that the Board approves the budget. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | : Suggest 'previous financial year'. We should allow for non-Board member participation writing the budget; technically, we should only require that the Board approves the budget. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Do you mean "''next'' financial year"? Not much point writing a budget for the previous year! Involving others is a good thing, but I don't know if it needs to go in the actual policy. We can change "write" to "approve" without losing anything, though. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
2. "This will be published before or soon after the beginning of the financial year." | 2. "This will be published before or soon after the beginning of the financial year." | ||
: Suggest a time limit of 1 month after the beginning of the financial year. 'soon' is a relative term. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | : Suggest a time limit of 1 month after the beginning of the financial year. 'soon' is a relative term. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
::This policy is only intended to last a year and I intend us to approve it at the same time as we approve the budget, so such a restriction wouldn't really work. I should add something to say that the policy needs to be reviewed in advance of the next year-end, though. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
3. Opportunity fund | 3. Opportunity fund | ||
: Suggest that the Board allocates funding out of the opportunity fund to project budgets, with a board member attached, rather than approving items individually. Also: this sentence needs less commas... [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | : Suggest that the Board allocates funding out of the opportunity fund to project budgets, with a board member attached, rather than approving items individually. Also: this sentence needs less commas... [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Yes, that's how I intend it to work. It's not what I've written, that is true - I should amend that. None of my sentences ever require less commas. Some do require ''fewer'' commas, though! ;) --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Also suggest renaming "Authorisation of Expenditure form" to "Expense authorisation form", and "Request for Reimbursement form" simply to "Expense form". [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | Also suggest renaming "Authorisation of Expenditure form" to "Expense authorisation form", and "Request for Reimbursement form" simply to "Expense form". [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
:We're not just talking about expenses (which usually refers to personal expenses, such as travel and accommodation), we're talking about all expenditure. --[[User:Tango|Tango]] 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:08, 3 February 2011
1. The Board of Trustees will write and publish a budget outlining expected income and expenditure during the financial year.
- Suggest 'previous financial year'. We should allow for non-Board member participation writing the budget; technically, we should only require that the Board approves the budget. Mike Peel 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Do you mean "next financial year"? Not much point writing a budget for the previous year! Involving others is a good thing, but I don't know if it needs to go in the actual policy. We can change "write" to "approve" without losing anything, though. --Tango 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
2. "This will be published before or soon after the beginning of the financial year."
- Suggest a time limit of 1 month after the beginning of the financial year. 'soon' is a relative term. Mike Peel 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- This policy is only intended to last a year and I intend us to approve it at the same time as we approve the budget, so such a restriction wouldn't really work. I should add something to say that the policy needs to be reviewed in advance of the next year-end, though. --Tango 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
3. Opportunity fund
- Suggest that the Board allocates funding out of the opportunity fund to project budgets, with a board member attached, rather than approving items individually. Also: this sentence needs less commas... Mike Peel 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, that's how I intend it to work. It's not what I've written, that is true - I should amend that. None of my sentences ever require less commas. Some do require fewer commas, though! ;) --Tango 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Also suggest renaming "Authorisation of Expenditure form" to "Expense authorisation form", and "Request for Reimbursement form" simply to "Expense form". Mike Peel 19:57, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- We're not just talking about expenses (which usually refers to personal expenses, such as travel and accommodation), we're talking about all expenditure. --Tango 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)